Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni
Program Studi S1 Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

Kode Dokumen

SEMESTER LEARNING PLAN

Course

KODE

Rumpun MataKuliah

Bobot Kredit

SEMESTER

Tanggal Penyusunan

English for Academic Purposes

8820304325

Mata Kuliah Wajib Program Studi

T=4

P=0

ECTS=6.36

4

28 Januari 2026

OTORISASI

Pengembang S.P

Koordinator Rumpun matakuliah

Koordinator Program Studi




Retno Wulandari, M.Pd


ABDUR ROSYID


HIMMAWAN ADI NUGROHO

Model Pembelajaran

Project Based Learning

Program Learning Outcomes (PLO)

PLO program Studi yang dibebankan pada matakuliah

PLO-3

Mengembangkan pemikiran logis, kritis, sistematis, dan kreatif dalam melakukan pekerjaan yang spesifik di bidang keahliannya serta sesuai dengan standar kompetensi kerja bidang yang bersangkutan

PLO-6

Mendemonstrasikan kompetensi lisan dan tulis yang setara dengan level B2 CEFR.

PLO-10

Melakukan penelitian dan pengkajian pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris.

Program Objectives (PO)

PO - 1

Analyze academic articles critically to gain an in-depth understanding of topics in English language learning, with the aid of digital databases and AI tools for efficient research and analysis.

PO - 2

Develop a well-structured annotated bibliography based on a critical analysis of relevant and credible academic sources

PO - 3

Understand the techniques of writing a review paper by analyzing the structure, arguments, and academic writing conventions used in academic articles

PO - 4

Write a well-structured review paper, using appropriate citations, references, and logical arguments in accordance with academic writing conventions

Matrik PLO-PO
 
POPLO-3PLO-6PLO-10
PO-1✔  
PO-2 ✔ 
PO-3  ✔
PO-4  ✔

Matrik PO pada Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar (Sub-PO)
 
PO Minggu Ke
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
PO-1✔✔✔✔✔✔
PO-2✔✔
PO-3✔✔✔✔
PO-4✔✔✔✔

Deskripsi Singkat Mata Kuliah

The English for Academic Purposes course is designed to equip students with essential skills in academic reading, research, and writing. This 4-credit course combines critical reading strategies with practical skills for producing high-quality research papers. Students will learn how to find suitable academic articles, critically analyze scholarly texts, and conduct literature reviews. Through a project-based approach, students will apply these skills to real-world research projects, culminating in the production of a well-structured academic paper. The course also covers citation, referencing, and academic writing conventions, ensuring that students are prepared to engage with academic literature and produce coherent, well-researched work.

Pustaka

Utama :

  1. Bailey, S. (2011). Academic writing: A handbook for international students (Third ed.). Oxon: Routledge.
  2. Gastel, B., & Day, A. Robert. (2022). How to write and publish scientific paper (ninth ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood
  3. Withers, C. M. (2019). Information literacy: Basic research skills. San Diego City College Library.
  4. Maimon, E. P., & Yancey, K. B. (2020). A writer’s resource: A handbook for writing and research (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  5. Nair, P. K. R., & Nair, V. D. (2014). Organization of a research paper: The IMRAD format. Springer International Publishing.

Pendukung :

  1. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2020). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (4th ed.). University of Michigan Press.
  2. RELO. (2016). Academic Writing for Publication: Workshop Materials for Trainers Working with University Scholar.
  3. Renandya, W. A. (2014). Choosing the right international journal in TESOL and Applied Linguistics. English Language Teaching World Online (ELTWO), 6, 1-17. Retrieved from http://blog.nus.edu.sg/eltwo/2014/06/18/choosing-the-right-international-journal-in-tesol-and-applied-linguistics-2/
  4. https://www.mendeley.com/guides
  5. https://guides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/24008452116749-Welcome-to-Turnitin-Guides
  6. Yeong, Foong May. 2014. How to Read and Critique a Scientific Research Article: Notes to Guide Students Reading Primary Literature (with Teaching Tips for Faculty Members). World Scientific
  7. Ajemba, M. N., & Arene, E. C. (2022). Research gaps for future research and their identification. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 16(1), 575–579. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2022.16.1.1062
  8. Showkat, N., & Parveen, H. (2017). Annotated bibliography, literature review. [ResearchGate]. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319162228

Dosen Pengampu

Nur Chakim, S.Pd., M.Pd.

Silfia Asningtias, S.Pd., M.TESOL., Ph.D

Zainul Aminin, S.Pd., M.Pd.

Abdur Rosyid, S.Pd., M.TESOL.

Retno Wulan Dari, S.Pd., M.Pd.

Eva Rahmawati, S.Pd., M.Pd.

Sueb, S.Pd., M.Pd.

Rizki Ramadhan, M.Pd.

Prianka Ratu Masitho, S.Pd., M.TESOL.

Wulida Wahidatul Masruria, M.Ed.

Minggu Ke-

Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar
(Sub-PO)

Penilaian

Bantuk Pembelajaran,

Metode Pembelajaran,

Penugasan Mahasiswa,

 [ Estimasi Waktu]

Materi Pembelajaran

[ Pustaka ]

Bobot Penilaian (%)

Indikator

Kriteria & Bentuk

Luring (offline)

Daring (online)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

1

Minggu ke 1

Categorizing literature sources and academic journals for effective research selection.

Understanding of the material, accuracy of responses, analysis, and coherence of answers.

 Kriteria:

A (90-100): Very accurate, B (75-89): Partially correct, C (60-74): Contains errors, D (50-59): Many mistakes


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Offline
4x50 menit		 -
 Materi: Types of academic journals
Pustaka: Renandya, W. A. (2014). Choosing the right international journal in TESOL and Applied Linguistics. English Language Teaching World Online (ELTWO), 6, 1-17. Retrieved from http://blog.nus.edu.sg/...
Materi: Types of Literature Sources
Pustaka: Withers, C. M. (2019). Information literacy: Basic research skills. San Diego City College Library.		 1%

2

Minggu ke 2

Finding and selecting credible sources using academic digital databases/platforms and AI tools

The execution of tasks, accuracy of responses, effective use of academic databases and AI tools, and the clarity of analysis and organization in the practical work.

 Kriteria:

A (90-100): Excellent execution with clear application of skills, thorough analysis, and effective use of academic databases, AI tools, and credible sources; B (75-89): Good execution with minor errors, demonstrating solid understanding and structured approach; C (60-74): Adequate execution with noticeable errors or gaps in analysis, use of tools, or sourcing; D (50-59): Inadequate execution with many errors, weak analysis, and poor use of academic databases, AI tools, or sources.


Bentuk Penilaian :
Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Offline
4x50 menit		 -
 Materi: Finding and selecting credible sources using academic digital databases/platforms and AI tools
Pustaka: Maimon, E. P., & Yancey, K. B. (2020). A writer’s resource: A handbook for writing and research (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Materi: Finding and selecting credible sources using academic digital databases/platforms and AI tools
Pustaka: Withers, C. M. (2019). Information literacy: Basic research skills. San Diego City College Library.		 1%

3

Minggu ke 3

Employing reference management tools such as Mendeley and Turnitin for the organization, citation, and verification of sources

Student participation, activity, and accuracy in utilizing tools like Mendeley and Turnitin for managing and verifying sources.

 Kriteria:

A (90-100): Excellent use of Mendeley and Turnitin with accurate citations and proper reference management. B (75-89): Good use with some minor errors in citations or organization. C (60-74): Adequate use with some issues in reference management or citation. D (50-59): Poor use with many errors in references or plagiarism checks.


Bentuk Penilaian :
Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Offline
4x50		 -
 Materi: Mendeley
Pustaka: https://www.mendeley.com/...
Materi: Turnitin
Pustaka: https://guides.turnitin.com/...		 2%

4

Minggu ke 4

Evaluating references and analyzing research articles using the AIMRAD structure.

Student participation, activity, and accuracy in evaluating references and analyzing research articles using the AIMRAD structure.

 Kriteria:

A (90-100): Excellent evaluation and analysis using the AIMRAD structure; B (75-89): Good evaluation with minor errors; C (60-74): Adequate evaluation with some mistakes; D (50-59): Poor evaluation with many errors in identifying the structure.


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Offline
4x50		 -
 Materi: Evaluating references
Pustaka: Yeong, Foong May. 2014. How to Read and Critique a Scientific Research Article: Notes to Guide Students Reading Primary Literature (with Teaching Tips for Faculty Members). World Scientific
Materi: IMRAD
Pustaka: Nair, P. K. R., & Nair, V. D. (2014). Organization of a research paper: The IMRAD format. Springer International Publishing.		 2%

5

Minggu ke 5

Identifying and formulating research gaps and research fills.

Student participation, activity, and accuracy in identifying and formulating research gaps and research fills.

 Kriteria:

A (90-100): Excellent identification and formulation of research gaps and fills with clear reasoning and strong support; B (75-89): Good identification with minor errors or missing links; C (60-74): Adequate identification and formulation, but with some unclear connections; D (50-59): Poor identification or formulation, with many gaps in analysis.


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Offline
4x50		 -
 Materi: Research Gaps
Pustaka: Ajemba, M. N., & Arene, E. C. (2022). Research gaps for future research and their identification. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 16(1), 575–579. https://doi.org/...		 2%

6

Minggu ke 6

Comparing journal articles to create a 5-part précis.

Student participation, activity, and accuracy in comparing journal articles and creating a 5-part précis.

 Kriteria:

A (90-100): Excellent comparison and 5-part précis with clear, concise summaries and critical analysis; B (75-89): Good comparison and précis with minor errors; C (60-74): Adequate comparison and précis with some unclear analysis; D (50-59): Poor comparison and précis with many gaps in analysis.


Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Offline
4x50		 -
 Materi: Comparing research articles
Pustaka: Yeong, Foong May. 2014. How to Read and Critique a Scientific Research Article: Notes to Guide Students Reading Primary Literature (with Teaching Tips for Faculty Members). World Scientific		 15%

7

Minggu ke 7

Identifying different types of annotated bibliographies and developing their own annotated bibliography.

Student participation, activity, and accuracy in identifying types of annotated bibliographies and developing an annotated bibliography.

 Kriteria:

A (90–100): Excellent identification of annotated bibliography types and a well-developed, accurate annotated bibliography; B (75–89): Good identification and development with minor errors; C (60–74): Adequate identification and development with some inaccuracies or incomplete annotations; D (50–59): Poor identification and development with many errors or unclear annotations.


Bentuk Penilaian :
Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Offline
4x50		 -
 Materi: Annotated Bibliography
Pustaka: Showkat, N., & Parveen, H. (2017). Annotated bibliography, literature review. [ResearchGate]. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/...		 2%

8

Minggu ke 8

Developing annotated bibliography

Selecting relevant sources and write concise, informative annotations.

 Kriteria:

A (90-100): Accurate citations with clear annotations; B (75-89): Good citations with minor gaps; C (60-74): Adequate citations with lacking clarity; D (50-59): Poor citations with errors.


Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Offline
4x50		 -
 Materi: Selecting relevant sources
Pustaka: Renandya, W. A. (2014). Choosing the right international journal in TESOL and Applied Linguistics. English Language Teaching World Online (ELTWO), 6, 1-17. Retrieved from http://blog.nus.edu.sg/...		 25%

9

Minggu ke 9

Justify the organization of the outline by explaining how it supports synthesis rather than mere summary.

Student participation, Accuracy in identifying the structure of a review paper, Ability to synthesize findings from multiple sources

 Kriteria:
  1. Student actively participates in class discussions, group work, and writing activities. (40)
  2. Student correctly identifies and explains the main parts of a review paper, using AIMRD. (40)
  3. Student combines ideas from different sources into a clear and meaningful explanation rather than simply listing or summarizing them. (20)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Mini lecture on review paper concepts and structure
Guided analysis of sample review articles (journal-based)
Group discussion on argument synthesis and thematic organization
In-class writing practice: drafting one thematic paragraph
Peer feedback session using a rubric
4 x 50		 -
 Materi: Definition and purpose of review papers
Pustaka: Bailey, S. (2011). Academic writing: A handbook for international students (Third ed.). Oxon: Routledge.		 1%

10

Minggu ke 10

Designing a logical outline of a review paper that reflects standard review paper structure (introduction, thematic sections, synthesis, and conclusion).
  1. Organize the introduction using standard rhetorical moves ,
  2. Use appropriate reporting verbs to refer to previous studies
  3. Produce a coherent and academically styled introduction
 Kriteria:
  1. The introduction has a clear background, literature overview, and purpose (30%).
  2. The sources are integrated correctly using proper in-text citations (25%)
  3. Appropriate reporting verbs are used to describe previous studies (20%)
  4. Verb tenses are used correctly and consistently (15%).
  5. The writing uses formal and academic language (10%).

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Through a process-oriented academic writing model
4x50		 -
 Materi: Understanding the organization of introduction
Pustaka: RELO. (2016). Academic Writing for Publication: Workshop Materials for Trainers Working with University Scholar.		 1%

11

Minggu ke 11

Developing introductions (2): Avoiding plagiarism in English academic writing
  1. Explain what plagiarism is in academic writing.
  2. Distinguish between plagiarized and correctly cited texts.
  3. Paraphrase ideas from sources using their own words.
  4. Use correct in-text citations.
  5. Produce an introduction paragraph that is free from plagiarism.
 Kriteria:
  1. Originality (30%).
  2. Using correct in-text citations (25%).
  3. Plagiarism (20%).
  4. Paraphrases ideas clearly and accurately (15%).
  5. Organization (10%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Direct Instruction (explaining plagiarism and citation rules)
Problem-Based Learning (identifying plagiarism cases)
Process-based Writing (drafting and revising)
Peer Learning (checking each other’s work)
4x50		 -
 Materi: Avoiding plagiarism
Pustaka: RELO. (2016). Academic Writing for Publication: Workshop Materials for Trainers Working with University Scholar.		 2%

12

Minggu ke 12

Developing the Method: working with sources (citing, paraphrasing, references and quotation, and combining sources)
  1. Use correct in-text citations
  2. Paraphrase information in their own words
  3. Use quotations correctly
  4. Write a correct reference list
  5. Combine information from more than one source in one paragraph
 Kriteria:
  1. Use of in-text citations 25%
  2. Paraphrasing 20%
  3. Use of quotations 15%
  4. Reference list 20%
  5. Combining sources 20%

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Direct instruction (rules of citation, quotation, and paraphrasing)
Problem-based learning (detecting incorrect source use)
Collaborative learning (peer checking and discussion)
4x50		 -
 Materi: citing, paraphrasing, references and quotation, and combining sources
Pustaka: Gastel, B., & Day, A. Robert. (2022). How to write and publish scientific paper (ninth ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood		 15%

13

Minggu ke 13

Composing the result and the discussion section in a scientific paper
  1. Distinguish between result statements and discussion statements
  2. Report findings clearly and accurately
  3. Interpret and explain results using academic language
  4. Write coherent results and discussion sections
 Kriteria:
  1. The results are reported clearly and correctly. (30%)
  2. The discussion explains the meaning of the results. (30%)
  3. The results and discussion are logically connected. (20%)
  4. The writing uses appropriate academic verbs and expressions. (20%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Direct instruction (explaining structure, language, and function)
Guided analysis (working with real journal articles)
Process-based writing (drafting, feedback, and revision)
4x50		 -
 Materi: How to write the result and the discussion section in research paper
Pustaka: Bailey, S. (2011). Academic writing: A handbook for international students (Third ed.). Oxon: Routledge.		 2%

14

Minggu ke 14

Composing conclusion and references in an academic article
  1. Write a conclusion that summarizes and synthesizes the main ideas
  2. Avoid adding new information in the conclusion
  3. Improve clarity and accuracy through proofreading
  4. Identify and correct language and citation errors
  5. Produce a clean and well-edited final draft
 Kriteria:
  1. The conclusion clearly summarizes the main ideas of the paper. (30%)
  2. The conclusion does not include new information. (15%)
  3. Grammar, spelling, and punctuation are correct after proofreading. (25%)
  4. Academic style and word choice are appropriate. (15%)
  5. Citations and formatting are checked and corrected. (15%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Direct instruction (explaining the functions and formats of conclusions and references)
Guided writing (step-by-step drafting)
Collaborative learning (peer review and checking)
Process-based writing (drafting, feedback, and revision)
 -
 Materi: How to write conclusion and references
Pustaka: Gastel, B., & Day, A. Robert. (2022). How to write and publish scientific paper (ninth ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood		 2%

15

Minggu ke 15

Composing abstract
  1. State the topic and purpose of the review clearly
  2. Produce a complete and coherent abstract
  3. Follow the standard structure of a review abstract
  4. Use clear and concise academic language
  5. Summarize the main themes and findings
 Kriteria:
  1. The abstract clearly states the topic and purpose. (25%)
  2. The abstract summarizes the main ideas of the review. (30%)
  3. The language is clear, concise, and academic. (20%)
  4. The abstract follows the correct structure. (15%)
  5. The abstract is complete and easy to understand. (10%)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Direct instruction (explaining the structure and language of abstracts)
Guided writing (step-by-step abstract drafting)
4x50		 -
 Materi: Write the abstract section
Pustaka: Gastel, B., & Day, A. Robert. (2022). How to write and publish scientific paper (ninth ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood		 2%

16

Minggu ke 16

Producing literature review academic article
  1. Write a complete review paper with all required sections
  2. Organize ideas logically across the paper
  3. Use correct citations and references
  4. Show synthesis and argument in discussing literature
  5. Use appropriate academic language
 Kriteria:
  1. Content: Fully addresses the task; ideas are clear, relevant, and well-developed with sufficient support. (30)
  2. Organization: Logical sequencing with effective use of connectors and cohesive devices. (25)
  3. Vocabulary: Uses a range of vocabulary, including less common words; appropriate word choice with few errors. (20)
  4. Language Use, and Conventions: Uses correct grammar, spelling, word choice, punctuation throughout with very few errors. (25)

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Process-based writing (drafting, feedback, and revision)
4x50
Materi: Produce literature review article
Pustaka: Gastel, B., & Day, A. Robert. (2022). How to write and publish scientific paper (ninth ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood		 25%



Rekap Persentase Evaluasi : Project Based Learning

No Evaluasi Persentase
1. Aktifitas Partisipasif 11%
2. Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk 82%
3. Praktik / Unjuk Kerja 7%
100%

Catatan

  1. Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan Program Studi (PLO - Program Studi) adalah kemampuan yang dimiliki oleh setiap lulusan Program Studi yang merupakan internalisasi dari sikap, penguasaan pengetahuan dan ketrampilan sesuai dengan jenjang prodinya yang diperoleh melalui proses pembelajaran.
  2. PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah adalah beberapa capaian pembelajaran lulusan program studi (CPL-Program Studi) yang digunakan untuk pembentukan/pengembangan sebuah mata kuliah yang terdiri dari aspek sikap, ketrampulan umum, ketrampilan khusus dan pengetahuan.
  3. Program Objectives (PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap bahan kajian atau materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
  4. Sub-PO Mata kuliah (Sub-PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PO yang dapat diukur atau diamati dan merupakan kemampuan akhir yang direncanakan pada tiap tahap pembelajaran, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
  5. Indikator penilaian kemampuan dalam proses maupun hasil belajar mahasiswa adalah pernyataan spesifik dan terukur yang mengidentifikasi kemampuan atau kinerja hasil belajar mahasiswa yang disertai bukti-bukti.
  6. Kreteria Penilaian adalah patokan yang digunakan sebagai ukuran atau tolok ukur ketercapaian pembelajaran dalam penilaian berdasarkan indikator-indikator yang telah ditetapkan. Kreteria penilaian merupakan pedoman bagi penilai agar penilaian konsisten dan tidak bias. Kreteria dapat berupa kuantitatif ataupun kualitatif.
  7. Bentuk penilaian: tes dan non-tes.
  8. Bentuk pembelajaran: Kuliah, Responsi, Tutorial, Seminar atau yang setara, Praktikum, Praktik Studio, Praktik Bengkel, Praktik Lapangan, Penelitian, Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat dan/atau bentuk pembelajaran lain yang setara.
  9. Metode Pembelajaran: Small Group Discussion, Role-Play & Simulation, Discovery Learning, Self-Directed Learning, Cooperative Learning, Collaborative Learning, Contextual Learning, Project Based Learning, dan metode lainnya yg setara.
  10. Materi Pembelajaran adalah rincian atau uraian dari bahan kajian yg dapat disajikan dalam bentuk beberapa pokok dan sub-pokok bahasan.
  11. Bobot penilaian adalah prosentasi penilaian terhadap setiap pencapaian sub-PO yang besarnya proposional dengan tingkat kesulitan pencapaian sub-PO tsb., dan totalnya 100%.
  12. TM=Tatap Muka, PT=Penugasan terstruktur, BM=Belajar mandiri.