Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni
Program Studi S1 Sastra Inggris (Kampus Kabupaten Magetan)

Kode Dokumen

SEMESTER LEARNING PLAN

Course

KODE

Rumpun MataKuliah

Bobot Kredit

SEMESTER

Tanggal Penyusunan

Critical Literacy

7922104061

Mata Kuliah Wajib Program Studi

T=4

P=0

ECTS=6.36

2

13 Juli 2025

OTORISASI

Pengembang S.P

Koordinator Rumpun matakuliah

Koordinator Program Studi




.......................................


.......................................


Lisetyo Ariyanti, S.S., M.Pd.

Model Pembelajaran

Project Based Learning

Program Learning Outcomes (PLO)

PLO program Studi yang dibebankan pada matakuliah

PLO-2

Menunjukkan karakter tangguh, kolaboratif, adaptif, inovatif, inklusif, belajar sepanjang hayat, dan berjiwa kewirausahaan

PLO-3

Mengembangkan pemikiran logis, kritis, sistematis, dan kreatif dalam melakukan pekerjaan yang spesifik di bidang keahliannya serta sesuai dengan standar kompetensi kerja bidang yang bersangkutan

PLO-10

Mampu menghasilkan karya akademik atau non-akademik dengan baik dalam bentuk lisan maupun tulisan untuk beragam audiens dan tujuan

PLO-11

Mampu mendemonstrasikan kemampuan berbahasa Inggris, yang ditunjukkan dengan pencapaian skor tes kemampuan Bahasa Inggris yang setara dengan minimal CEFR level B2

Program Objectives (PO)

PO - 1

Being able to work in a group for discussing how SDGs issues are represented and potentially challenged within literary and cultural texts

PO - 2

Being able to apply critical and creative thinking in projects that integrate critical literacy with current technological tools and platforms (blog, podcast, YouTube)

PO - 3

Being able to write non-academic pieces, such as reviews about SDGs issues, for different audiences and contexts, demonstrating the ability to make complex ideas easy to understand.

PO - 4

Being able to compose analytical essay writings, which include introductory, body, and concluding paragraphs as well as .

Matrik PLO-PO
 
POPLO-2PLO-3PLO-10PLO-11
PO-1✔   
PO-2 ✔  
PO-3   ✔
PO-4  ✔ 

Matrik PO pada Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar (Sub-PO)
 
PO Minggu Ke
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
PO-1✔✔✔✔
PO-2✔✔✔✔
PO-3✔✔✔✔
PO-4✔✔✔✔

Deskripsi Singkat Mata Kuliah

This course aims to enhance students‘ reading and writing proficiency for academic purposes. Updating SDG issues will also enhance the learning process. Learning materials will cover various academic writing genres, including essays, reports, and research papers. Moreover, the teaching approach emphasizes interactive learning through workshops, discussions, and individual feedback. In constructing evaluations for each participant, assessments will include quizzes and group studies that require tasks such as projects, case study analyses, or reflective reports. By the end of the course, participants will be able to demonstrate critical reading and analytical writing skills, some of which will relate to SDG issues.

Pustaka

Utama :

  1. 1. Zemach, D E & Ghulldu, L A. 2011. Writing essays: from paragraph to essay. London: Macmillan
  2. 2. Bailey, S. 2018. Academic writing : a handbook for international students. New York: Routledge
  3. 3. Kirszner, L G & Mandell, S R. 2018. Patterns for college writing (14th edition). Boston: Bedford/St
  4. 4. Newsome, Bruce. 2016. An Introduction to research analysis and writing. California:Sage publication
  5. 5. Chin, P et al. 2015. Academic Writing Skills 2 Student’s Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pendukung :

  1. News Articles
  2. Journals
  3. Social Media Posts

Dosen Pengampu

Dr. Much. Koiri, M.Si.

Silvy Cinthia Adelia, S.S., M.A.

Suyanti Fatma Umayfa, S.S., M.A.

Minggu Ke-

Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar
(Sub-PO)

Penilaian

Bantuk Pembelajaran,

Metode Pembelajaran,

Penugasan Mahasiswa,

 [ Estimasi Waktu]

Materi Pembelajaran

[ Pustaka ]

Bobot Penilaian (%)

Indikator

Kriteria & Bentuk

Luring (offline)

Daring (online)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

1

Minggu ke 1
  1. Being able to identify main ideas and kinds of support in a text.
  2. Being able to develop the skills to determine if online information is believable and accurate
  3. Being able to analyse the use of rhetoric, language, and visual elements to persuade audiences in different contexts

Being able to identify main ideas and kind of support in text Cause-effect

 Kriteria:

Written


Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Reading : Learn to identify main ideas from text with topic business. (Inside Reading 2, Unit 2).
[2 (2x50’)]

Writing : Learn to demonstrates and practises two methods of describing the link, with the focus either on the cause or on the effect. Develop a strong cause-effect thesis statement and organize ideas into a logical sequence.. (Academic Writing : A handbook for International Students)
[2 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Individual assignment
Discussion
2 x 50		 Materi: Learn to identify main ideas and kind of support in text Cause-effect
Pustaka: 1. Zemach, D E & Ghulldu, L A. 2011. Writing essays: from paragraph to essay. London: Macmillan
Materi: Learn to identify main ideas and kind of support in text Cause-effect
Pustaka: 3. Kirszner, L G & Mandell, S R. 2018. Patterns for college writing (14th edition). Boston: Bedford/St		 2%

2

Minggu ke 2
  1. Being able to identify main ideas and kinds of support in a text.
  2. Being able to develop the skills to determine if online information is believable and accurate
  3. Being able to analyse the use of rhetoric, language, and visual elements to persuade audiences in different contexts

Being able to identify main ideas and kind of support in text Cause-effect

 Kriteria:

Written


Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Reading : Learn to identify main ideas from text with topic business. (Inside Reading 2, Unit 2).
[2 (2x50’)]

Writing : Learn to demonstrates and practises two methods of describing the link, with the focus either on the cause or on the effect. Develop a strong cause-effect thesis statement and organize ideas into a logical sequence.. (Academic Writing : A handbook for International Students)
[2 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Individual assignment
Discussion
2 x 50		 Materi: Learn to identify main ideas and kind of support in text Cause-effect
Pustaka: 1. Zemach, D E & Ghulldu, L A. 2011. Writing essays: from paragraph to essay. London: Macmillan
Materi: Learn to identify main ideas and kind of support in text Cause-effect
Pustaka: 3. Kirszner, L G & Mandell, S R. 2018. Patterns for college writing (14th edition). Boston: Bedford/St		 2%

3

Minggu ke 3
  1. Being able to analyse the use of rhetoric, language, and visual elements to persuade audiences in different contexts
  2. Being able to examine how texts are shaped by their intended audience, purpose, and the social/cultural contexts in which they are created

Practice reading and understanding charts and graphs, Compare – Contrast

 Kriteria:

Written


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Reading : Practice reading and understanding charts and graphs. Discuss about Weather Warnings (SDG 13) (Inside Reading 2, Unit 5).
[2 (2x50’)]
Writing : Develop clear comparisons between two subjects. Use point-by-point or block organization effectively. (Academic Writing : A handbook for International Students)
[2 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Individual and Group analysis.
Assignment
Discussion
[2 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Materi: Practice reading and understanding charts and graphs, Compare – Contrast
Pustaka: 1. Zemach, D E & Ghulldu, L A. 2011. Writing essays: from paragraph to essay. London: Macmillan
Materi: Practice reading and understanding charts and graphs, Compare – Contrast
Pustaka: 2. Bailey, S. 2018. Academic writing : a handbook for international students. New York: Routledge
Materi: Practice reading and understanding charts and graphs, Compare – Contrast
Pustaka: 3. Kirszner, L G & Mandell, S R. 2018. Patterns for college writing (14th edition). Boston: Bedford/St		 3%

4

Minggu ke 4
  1. Being able to analyse the use of rhetoric, language, and visual elements to persuade audiences in different contexts
  2. Being able to examine how texts are shaped by their intended audience, purpose, and the social/cultural contexts in which they are created

Practice reading and understanding charts and graphs, Compare – Contrast

 Kriteria:

Written


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Reading : Practice reading and understanding charts and graphs. Discuss about Weather Warnings (SDG 13) (Inside Reading 2, Unit 5).
[2 (2x50’)]
Writing : Develop clear comparisons between two subjects. Use point-by-point or block organization effectively. (Academic Writing : A handbook for International Students)
[2 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Individual and Group analysis.
Assignment
Discussion
[2 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Materi: Practice reading and understanding charts and graphs, Compare – Contrast
Pustaka: 1. Zemach, D E & Ghulldu, L A. 2011. Writing essays: from paragraph to essay. London: Macmillan
Materi: Practice reading and understanding charts and graphs, Compare – Contrast
Pustaka: 2. Bailey, S. 2018. Academic writing : a handbook for international students. New York: Routledge
Materi: Practice reading and understanding charts and graphs, Compare – Contrast
Pustaka: 3. Kirszner, L G & Mandell, S R. 2018. Patterns for college writing (14th edition). Boston: Bedford/St		 3%

5

Minggu ke 5
  1. Being able to apply critical literacy skills to analyse social issues
  2. Being able to apply critical literacy skills in an appropriate manner

Present and summarize the key findings., Problem-Solutions

 Kriteria:

Written and spoken


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Reading : Practice reading and summarizing specific text about brain food. (SDG 2) (Inside Reading 2, Unit 5).
[2 (2x50’)]

Writing : Identify real-world problems and propose feasible solutions.Organize a problem-solution essay clearly. (Academic Writing : A handbook for International Students)
[2 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Sindig
2 x 50		 Materi: Present and summarize the key findings., Problem-Solutions
Pustaka: 1. Zemach, D E & Ghulldu, L A. 2011. Writing essays: from paragraph to essay. London: Macmillan
Materi: Present and summarize the key findings., Problem-Solutions
Pustaka: 2. Bailey, S. 2018. Academic writing : a handbook for international students. New York: Routledge
Materi: Present and summarize the key findings., Problem-Solutions
Pustaka: 3. Kirszner, L G & Mandell, S R. 2018. Patterns for college writing (14th edition). Boston: Bedford/St		 3%

6

Minggu ke 6
  1. Being able to apply critical literacy skills to analyse social issues
  2. Being able to apply critical literacy skills in an appropriate manner

Present and summarize the key findings., Problem-Solutions

 Kriteria:

Written and spoken


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Reading : Practice reading and summarizing specific text about brain food. (SDG 2) (Inside Reading 2, Unit 5).
[2 (2x50’)]

Writing : Identify real-world problems and propose feasible solutions.Organize a problem-solution essay clearly. (Academic Writing : A handbook for International Students)
[2 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Sindig
2 x 50		 Materi: Present and summarize the key findings., Problem-Solutions
Pustaka: 1. Zemach, D E & Ghulldu, L A. 2011. Writing essays: from paragraph to essay. London: Macmillan
Materi: Present and summarize the key findings., Problem-Solutions
Pustaka: 2. Bailey, S. 2018. Academic writing : a handbook for international students. New York: Routledge
Materi: Present and summarize the key findings., Problem-Solutions
Pustaka: 3. Kirszner, L G & Mandell, S R. 2018. Patterns for college writing (14th edition). Boston: Bedford/St		 3%

7

Minggu ke 7
  1. Being able to evaluate media messages, recognize the influence of media on individuals and society, and make informed media choices
  2. Being able to analyse personal biases, as well as biases present in texts and media, to develop more objective and informed perspectives
  3. Being able to create a piece of writing that highlights the importance of diverse voices and experiences in understanding a specific issue

Applying annotatung and highllighting soecific text, Final of expository writing

 Kriteria:

Based on the right answers and written


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Reading : Practice Annotated and highlighting from the text (SDG 13) (Inside Reading 2, Unit 8).
[2 (2x50’)]

Writing : Apply final revisions to improve writing quality. Provide constructive feedback on classmates’ work. (Academic Writing : A handbook for International Students)
[2 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Sindig
2 x 50		 Materi: Applying annotatung and highllighting soecific text, Final of expository writing
Pustaka: 4. Newsome, Bruce. 2016. An Introduction to research analysis and writing. California:Sage publication
Materi: Applying annotatung and highllighting soecific text, Final of expository writing
Pustaka: 5. Chin, P et al. 2015. Academic Writing Skills 2 Student’s Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.		 3%

8

Minggu ke 8
  1. Being able to evaluate media messages, recognize the influence of media on individuals and society, and make informed media choices
  2. Being able to analyse personal biases, as well as biases present in texts and media, to develop more objective and informed perspectives
  3. Being able to create a piece of writing that highlights the importance of diverse voices and experiences in understanding a specific issue

Applying annotatung and highllighting soecific text, Final of expository writing

 Kriteria:

Based on the right answers and written


Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Reading : Practice Annotated and highlighting from the text (SDG 13) (Inside Reading 2, Unit 8).
[2 (2x50’)]

Writing : Apply final revisions to improve writing quality. Provide constructive feedback on classmates’ work. (Academic Writing : A handbook for International Students)
[2 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Sindig
2 x 50		 Materi: Applying annotatung and highllighting soecific text, Final of expository writing
Pustaka: 4. Newsome, Bruce. 2016. An Introduction to research analysis and writing. California:Sage publication
Materi: Applying annotatung and highllighting soecific text, Final of expository writing
Pustaka: 5. Chin, P et al. 2015. Academic Writing Skills 2 Student’s Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.		 3%

9

Minggu ke 9
  1. Being able to evaluate media messages, recognize the influence of media on individuals and society, and make informed media choices
  2. . Being able to apply critical literacy skills to analyse social issues

Summarize and discuss the key findings

 Kriteria:

Written and spoken


Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Discussion
Individual assignment
[1 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Google Classroom
2 x 50		 Materi: Summarize and discuss the key findings
Pustaka: News Articles
Materi: Summarize and discuss the key findings
Pustaka: Journals		 5%

10

Minggu ke 10
  1. Being able to discuss complex and potentially controversial issues respectfully, using evidence-based arguments and listening actively to diverse perspectives
  2. Being able to evaluate media messages, recognize the influence of media on individuals and society, and make informed media choices
  3. . Being able to apply critical literacy skills to analyse social issues

Finding the author’s purpose in specific text. Writing : Introduction to Analytical Writing and learning what is Thesis Statements

 Kriteria:

Project (Mid Term)


Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Reading : Finding the author’s purpose in specific text (Inside Reading 3, Unit 2).
[2 (2x50’)]

Writing : Introduction to Analytical Writing and Thesis Statements.
[2 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Discussion
Individual Assignment
[3 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Materi: midterm project
Pustaka: Social Media Posts		 20%

11

Minggu ke 11
  1. Being able to apply critical literacy skills to analyse social issues
  2. Being able to apply critical literacy skills in an appropriate manner

Interpreting data in charts by reading publich health. Writing : Developing Arguments, Structuring, and Drafting

 Kriteria:

written and project


Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Reading : Interpreting data in charts by reading publich health (Inside Reading 3, Unit 4).
[2 (2x50’)]

Writing : Writing and developments arguments.
[2 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Discussion
Individual assignment
[1 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Materi: Interpreting data in charts by reading publich health. Writing : Developing Arguments, Structuring, and Drafting
Pustaka: 1. Zemach, D E & Ghulldu, L A. 2011. Writing essays: from paragraph to essay. London: Macmillan
Materi: Interpreting data in charts by reading publich health. Writing : Developing Arguments, Structuring, and Drafting
Pustaka: 2. Bailey, S. 2018. Academic writing : a handbook for international students. New York: Routledge
Materi: Interpreting data in charts by reading publich health. Writing : Developing Arguments, Structuring, and Drafting
Pustaka: 3. Kirszner, L G & Mandell, S R. 2018. Patterns for college writing (14th edition). Boston: Bedford/St		 3%

12

Minggu ke 12
  1. Being able to apply critical literacy skills to analyse social issues
  2. Being able to apply critical literacy skills in an appropriate manner

Interpreting data in charts by reading publich health. Writing : Developing Arguments, Structuring, and Drafting

 Kriteria:

project and written


Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Reading : Interpreting data in charts by reading publich health (Inside Reading 3, Unit 4).
[2 (2x50’)]

Writing : Writing and developments arguments.
[2 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Discussion
Individual assignment
[1 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Materi: Interpreting data in charts by reading publich health. Writing : Developing Arguments, Structuring, and Drafting
Pustaka: 1. Zemach, D E & Ghulldu, L A. 2011. Writing essays: from paragraph to essay. London: Macmillan
Materi: Interpreting data in charts by reading publich health. Writing : Developing Arguments, Structuring, and Drafting
Pustaka: 2. Bailey, S. 2018. Academic writing : a handbook for international students. New York: Routledge
Materi: Interpreting data in charts by reading publich health. Writing : Developing Arguments, Structuring, and Drafting
Pustaka: 3. Kirszner, L G & Mandell, S R. 2018. Patterns for college writing (14th edition). Boston: Bedford/St		 5%

13

Minggu ke 13
  1. Being able to discuss complex and potentially controversial issues respectfully, using evidence-based arguments and listening actively to diverse perspectives
  2. Being able to evaluate media messages, recognize the influence of media on individuals and society, and make informed media choices
  3. Being able to apply critical literacy skills to analyse social issues

Sumamrizing including non-text elements. Writing : Strategies for self-revision and peer feedback. Checking for clarity, coherence, and consistency

 Kriteria:

written and project


Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Reading : Interpreting data in charts by reading publich health (Inside Reading 3, Unit 5).
[2 (2x50’)]

Writing : Strategies for self-revision and peer feedback. Checking for clarity, coherence, and consistency (2x50’)
2 x 50		 Discussion
Group Assignment
[3 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Materi: Sumamrizing including non-text elements. Writing : Strategies for self-revision and peer feedback. Checking for clarity, coherence, and consistency
Pustaka: 1. Zemach, D E & Ghulldu, L A. 2011. Writing essays: from paragraph to essay. London: Macmillan
Materi: Sumamrizing including non-text elements. Writing : Strategies for self-revision and peer feedback. Checking for clarity, coherence, and consistency
Pustaka: 2. Bailey, S. 2018. Academic writing : a handbook for international students. New York: Routledge
Materi: Sumamrizing including non-text elements. Writing : Strategies for self-revision and peer feedback. Checking for clarity, coherence, and consistency
Pustaka: 3. Kirszner, L G & Mandell, S R. 2018. Patterns for college writing (14th edition). Boston: Bedford/St		 5%

14

Minggu ke 14
  1. Being able to discuss complex and potentially controversial issues respectfully, using evidence-based arguments and listening actively to diverse perspectives
  2. Being able to evaluate media messages, recognize the influence of media on individuals and society, and make informed media choices
  3. Being able to apply critical literacy skills to analyse social issues

Sumamrizing including non-text elements. Writing : Strategies for self-revision and peer feedback. Checking for clarity, coherence, and consistency

 Kriteria:

written and project


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Reading : Interpreting data in charts by reading publich health (Inside Reading 3, Unit 5).
[2 (2x50’)]

Writing : Strategies for self-revision and peer feedback. Checking for clarity, coherence, and consistency (2x50’)
2 x 50		 Discussion
Group Assignment
[3 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Materi: Sumamrizing including non-text elements. Writing : Strategies for self-revision and peer feedback. Checking for clarity, coherence, and consistency
Pustaka: 1. Zemach, D E & Ghulldu, L A. 2011. Writing essays: from paragraph to essay. London: Macmillan
Materi: Sumamrizing including non-text elements. Writing : Strategies for self-revision and peer feedback. Checking for clarity, coherence, and consistency
Pustaka: 2. Bailey, S. 2018. Academic writing : a handbook for international students. New York: Routledge
Materi: Sumamrizing including non-text elements. Writing : Strategies for self-revision and peer feedback. Checking for clarity, coherence, and consistency
Pustaka: 3. Kirszner, L G & Mandell, S R. 2018. Patterns for college writing (14th edition). Boston: Bedford/St		 5%

15

Minggu ke 15
  1. Being able to discuss complex and potentially controversial issues respectfully, using evidence-based arguments and listening actively to diverse perspectives
  2. Being able to evaluate media messages, recognize the influence of media on individuals and society, and make informed media choices
  3. Being able to apply critical literacy skills to analyse social issues

Sumamrizing including non-text elements. Writing : Strategies for self-revision and peer feedback. Checking for clarity, coherence, and consistency

 Kriteria:

written and project


Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Reading : Interpreting data in charts by reading publich health (Inside Reading 3, Unit 5).
[2 (2x50’)]

Writing : Strategies for self-revision and peer feedback. Checking for clarity, coherence, and consistency (2x50’)
2 x 50		 Discussion
Group Assignment
[3 (2x50’)]
2 x 50		 Materi: Sumamrizing including non-text elements. Writing : Strategies for self-revision and peer feedback. Checking for clarity, coherence, and consistency
Pustaka: 4. Newsome, Bruce. 2016. An Introduction to research analysis and writing. California:Sage publication
Materi: Sumamrizing including non-text elements. Writing : Strategies for self-revision and peer feedback. Checking for clarity, coherence, and consistency
Pustaka: 5. Chin, P et al. 2015. Academic Writing Skills 2 Student’s Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.		 5%

16

Minggu ke 16
  1. Being able to discuss complex and potentially controversial issues respectfully, using evidence-based arguments and listening actively to diverse perspectives
  2. Being able to evaluate media messages, recognize the influence of media on individuals and society, and make informed media choices
  3. Being able to apply critical literacy skills to analyse social issues

Final test

 Kriteria:

project final test


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Final Test
2 x 50
2 x 50		 Materi: project
Pustaka: News Articles
Materi: project
Pustaka: Journals		 30%



Rekap Persentase Evaluasi : Project Based Learning

No Evaluasi Persentase
1. Aktifitas Partisipasif 40%
2. Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk 60%
100%

Catatan

  1. Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan Program Studi (PLO - Program Studi) adalah kemampuan yang dimiliki oleh setiap lulusan Program Studi yang merupakan internalisasi dari sikap, penguasaan pengetahuan dan ketrampilan sesuai dengan jenjang prodinya yang diperoleh melalui proses pembelajaran.
  2. PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah adalah beberapa capaian pembelajaran lulusan program studi (CPL-Program Studi) yang digunakan untuk pembentukan/pengembangan sebuah mata kuliah yang terdiri dari aspek sikap, ketrampulan umum, ketrampilan khusus dan pengetahuan.
  3. Program Objectives (PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap bahan kajian atau materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
  4. Sub-PO Mata kuliah (Sub-PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PO yang dapat diukur atau diamati dan merupakan kemampuan akhir yang direncanakan pada tiap tahap pembelajaran, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
  5. Indikator penilaian kemampuan dalam proses maupun hasil belajar mahasiswa adalah pernyataan spesifik dan terukur yang mengidentifikasi kemampuan atau kinerja hasil belajar mahasiswa yang disertai bukti-bukti.
  6. Kreteria Penilaian adalah patokan yang digunakan sebagai ukuran atau tolok ukur ketercapaian pembelajaran dalam penilaian berdasarkan indikator-indikator yang telah ditetapkan. Kreteria penilaian merupakan pedoman bagi penilai agar penilaian konsisten dan tidak bias. Kreteria dapat berupa kuantitatif ataupun kualitatif.
  7. Bentuk penilaian: tes dan non-tes.
  8. Bentuk pembelajaran: Kuliah, Responsi, Tutorial, Seminar atau yang setara, Praktikum, Praktik Studio, Praktik Bengkel, Praktik Lapangan, Penelitian, Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat dan/atau bentuk pembelajaran lain yang setara.
  9. Metode Pembelajaran: Small Group Discussion, Role-Play & Simulation, Discovery Learning, Self-Directed Learning, Cooperative Learning, Collaborative Learning, Contextual Learning, Project Based Learning, dan metode lainnya yg setara.
  10. Materi Pembelajaran adalah rincian atau uraian dari bahan kajian yg dapat disajikan dalam bentuk beberapa pokok dan sub-pokok bahasan.
  11. Bobot penilaian adalah prosentasi penilaian terhadap setiap pencapaian sub-PO yang besarnya proposional dengan tingkat kesulitan pencapaian sub-PO tsb., dan totalnya 100%.
  12. TM=Tatap Muka, PT=Penugasan terstruktur, BM=Belajar mandiri.