Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni
Program Studi S1 Sastra Inggris

Kode Dokumen

SEMESTER LEARNING PLAN

Course

KODE

Rumpun MataKuliah

Bobot Kredit

SEMESTER

Tanggal Penyusunan

Critical Oracy

7920204313

Mata Kuliah Wajib Program Studi

T=2

P=1

ECTS=4.77

2

23 Januari 2025

OTORISASI

Pengembang S.P

Koordinator Rumpun matakuliah

Koordinator Program Studi




Cicilia Deandra Maya Putri, S.Hum., M.A.


Cicilia Deandra Maya Putri, S.Hum., M.A.


Dr. Ali Mustofa, S.S., M.Pd.

Model Pembelajaran

Case Study

Program Learning Outcomes (PLO)

PLO program Studi yang dibebankan pada matakuliah

PLO-2

Menunjukkan karakter tangguh, kolaboratif, adaptif, inovatif, inklusif, belajar sepanjang hayat, dan berjiwa kewirausahaan

PLO-3

Mengembangkan pemikiran logis, kritis, sistematis, dan kreatif dalam melakukan pekerjaan yang spesifik di bidang keahliannya serta sesuai dengan standar kompetensi kerja bidang yang bersangkutan

PLO-10

Mampu menghasilkan karya akademik atau non-akademik dengan baik dalam bentuk lisan maupun tulisan untuk beragam audiens dan tujuan

PLO-11

Mampu mendemonstrasikan kemampuan berbahasa Inggris, yang ditunjukkan dengan pencapaian skor tes kemampuan Bahasa Inggris yang setara dengan minimal CEFR level B2

Program Objectives (PO)

PO - 1

Being able to construct and defend arguments on a certain topic within group discussion or individually.

PO - 2

Being able to analyze and evaluate general and specific information of various monologues and dialogues and identifying general and specific information of longer dialogues and monologues of non-authentic and authentic materials with various genres.

PO - 3

Being able to demonstrate effective public speaking and debate skills in informative, descriptive, and persuasive contexts using parliamentary debate systems, apply critical listening skills through analysis of complex audio-visual materials

PO - 4

Being able to use appropriate grammar, communication style, and clear pronunciation in speeches, and apply critical listening skills to analyze and respond effectively consistent with the CEFR Level B2 proficiency.

Matrik PLO-PO
 
POPLO-2PLO-3PLO-10PLO-11
PO-1✔   
PO-2 ✔  
PO-3  ✔ 
PO-4   ✔

Matrik PO pada Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar (Sub-PO)
 
PO Minggu Ke
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
PO-1✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔
PO-2✔✔✔✔
PO-3✔✔
PO-4✔

Deskripsi Singkat Mata Kuliah

This course aims to equip students with the skills necessary for effective and ethical oral communication, preparing them for diverse professional and personal situations, including those related to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The course focuses on enhancing public speaking, debating, and discussion skills, with an emphasis on critical thinking, argumentation, and active listening. Students will learn to construct and deconstruct arguments, engage in meaningful dialogues, and present ideas clearly and persuasively. Teaching methods include lectures, interactive seminars, group discussions, debates, speech delivery, presentations, critical analyses of recorded speeches, and peer reviews. Formative assessments will be based on oral presentations, participation in debates and discussions, written assignments analyzing arguments and speeches, and reflective journals on personal communication experiences. Summative assessment will involve a group-based project, creating a campaign video related to an SDGs issue. By the end of the course, students will be able to think critically and communicate effectively in diverse oral formats.

Pustaka

Utama :

  1. Lougheed. 2013. Barron’s IELTS Practice Exams. Columbia University: USA.
  2. Gear & Gear. 2011. Cambridge Preparation for the TOEFL Test. Cambridge University Press: USA.
  3. Freely, A.J. & Steinberg, D.L. 2009. Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 12th edition. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  4. Osborn, M., Osborn, S., and Osborn, R. (2017). Public Speaking (11th ed.). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Pendukung :

Dosen Pengampu

Lina Purwaning Hartanti, S.Pd., M.EIL.

Adam Damanhuri, S.S., M.Hum.

Imam Hanafi, S.S., M.App.Ling.

Dwi Nur Cahyani Sri Kusumaningtyas, S.S., M.Hum.

Uci Elly Kholidah, S.S., M.A.

Ephrilia Noor Fitriana, S.Hum., M.Hum.

Cicilia Deandra Maya Putri, S.Hum., M.A.

Suyanti Fatma Umayfa, S.S., M.A.

Minggu Ke-

Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar
(Sub-PO)

Penilaian

Bantuk Pembelajaran,

Metode Pembelajaran,

Penugasan Mahasiswa,

 [ Estimasi Waktu]

Materi Pembelajaran

[ Pustaka ]

Bobot Penilaian (%)

Indikator

Kriteria & Bentuk

Luring (offline)

Daring (online)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

1

Minggu ke 1
  1. Being able to distinguish general and specific information in monologues of critical thinking
  2. Being able to distinguish general and specific information in dialogues of critical thinking
  1. Answer comprehension questions on general and specific information in monologues about being a good speaker using correct grammar.
  2. Answer comprehension questions on specific information in TOEFL dialogues
 Kriteria:

written


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Speaking:
Introduction to the course

How to be a Good Speaker

Individual assignment
[1 (2x50’)]


Listening:
Introduction to TOEFL

TOEFL Exercise 1

Individual assignment
[1 (2x50’)]
 Speaking:
Introduction to the course

How to be a Good Speaker

Individual assignment
[1 (2x50’)]


Listening:
Introduction to TOEFL

TOEFL Exercise 1

Individual assignment
[1 (2x50’)]
 Materi: Types of Public Speaking
Pustaka: Osborn, M., Osborn, S., and Osborn, R. (2017). Public Speaking (11th ed.). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.		 2%

2

Minggu ke 2
  1. Being able to develop arguments, using evidence and rhetorical devices to support their position.
  2. Being able to distinguish general and specific information in dialogues of critical thinking
  1. Answer comprehension questions about various types of speeches.
  2. Answer comprehension questions on specific information in TOEFL dialogues
 Kriteria:
  1. Written
  2. Spoken

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Speaking:
Various Types of Speeches (theoretical)
Individual assignment
[1 (2x50’)]



Listening:
TOEFL Exercise 2


Individual assignment
[1 (2x50’)]
 Speaking:
Various Types of Speeches (theoretical)
Individual assignment
[1 (2x50’)]



Listening:
TOEFL Exercise 2


Individual assignment
[1 (2x50’)]
 Materi: Introducing Speech Matrix
Pustaka: Osborn, M., Osborn, S., and Osborn, R. (2017). Public Speaking (11th ed.). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.		 2%

3

Minggu ke 3
  1. Being able to develop arguments, using evidence and rhetorical devices to support their position.
  2. Being able to distinguish general and specific information in dialogues of critical thinking
  1. Create a matrix on a certain speech type.
  2. Answer comprehension questions on specific information in TOEFL dialogues
 Kriteria:

Written


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Portofolio

Materi: Finalizing Speech Matrix
Pustaka: Osborn, M., Osborn, S., and Osborn, R. (2017). Public Speaking (11th ed.). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.		 3%

4

Minggu ke 4
  1. Being able to develop arguments, using evidence and rhetorical devices to support their position.
  2. Being able to distinguish general and specific information in dialogues of critical thinking
  1. Create a matrix on a certain speech type.
  2. Answer comprehension questions on specific information in TOEFL dialogues
 Kriteria:
  1. Written
  2. Spoken

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Portofolio		 Introduction to Matrix and Matrix Consultation
100 menit
Materi: Matrix Consultation
Pustaka: Osborn, M., Osborn, S., and Osborn, R. (2017). Public Speaking (11th ed.). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.		 10%

5

Minggu ke 5
  1. Being able to demonstrate prepared speeches (informative and persuasive) on various SDG issues.
  2. Being able to summarize the main ideas and supporting details in authentic materials related to critical thinking
  1. Deliver a certain speech based on the consulted matrix on an SDG topic.
  2. Summarize a certain speech delivered in class.
 Kriteria:
  1. Spoken
  2. Written

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Summarize a speech performed by peer.
100 menit
Materi: Speech Delivery
Pustaka: Osborn, M., Osborn, S., and Osborn, R. (2017). Public Speaking (11th ed.). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.		 10%

6

Minggu ke 6
  1. Being able to demonstrate prepared speeches (informative and persuasive) on various SDG issues.
  2. Being able to summarize the main ideas and supporting details in authentic materials related to critical thinking
  1. Deliver a certain speech based on the consulted matrix on an SDG topic.
  2. Summarize a certain speech delivered in class.
 Kriteria:
  1. Written
  2. Spoken

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Speech Performance
100 menit
Materi: Speech Delivery
Pustaka: Osborn, M., Osborn, S., and Osborn, R. (2017). Public Speaking (11th ed.). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.		 15%

7

Minggu ke 7
  1. Being able to demonstrate prepared speeches (informative and persuasive) on various SDG issues.
  2. Being able to summarize the main ideas and supporting details in authentic materials related to critical thinking
  1. Deliver a certain speech based on the consulted matrix on an SDG topic.
  2. Summarize a certain speech delivered in class.
 Kriteria:
  1. Spoken
  2. Written

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Speech performance and Summarize a speech performed by peer.
100 menit
Materi: Speech Delivery
Pustaka: Osborn, M., Osborn, S., and Osborn, R. (2017). Public Speaking (11th ed.). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.		 10%

8

Minggu ke 8
  1. Being able to demonstrate prepared speeches (informative and persuasive) on various SDG issues.
  2. Being able to summarize the main ideas and supporting details in authentic materials related to critical thinking
  1. Deliver a certain speech based on the consulted matrix on an SDG topic.
  2. Summarize a certain speech delivered in class.
 Kriteria:

Written


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Portofolio		 Reflective Practice
100 menit
Materi: Feedback Session
Pustaka: Osborn, M., Osborn, S., and Osborn, R. (2017). Public Speaking (11th ed.). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.		 15%

9

Minggu ke 9
  1. Being able to identify the key elements of debating, including the structure of a debate, the roles of the speakers, and the types of arguments that are commonly used.
  2. Being able to summarize the main ideas and supporting details in non-authentic materials related to critical thinking
  1. Answer comprehension questions on specific information in IELTS dialogues .
  2. Contsruct an argument effectively
 Kriteria:
  1. Spoken
  2. Written

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Introduction to ARE (Argumentation)
100 menit
Materi: Introduction to ARE (Argumentation)
Pustaka: Freely, A.J. & Steinberg, D.L. 2009. Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 12th edition. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.		 2%

10

Minggu ke 10
  1. Being able to evaluate arguments presented by others, and to identify flaws or weaknesses in those arguments.
  2. Being able to summarize the main ideas and supporting details in authentic materials related to critical thinking
  3. Being able to summarize the main ideas and supporting details in authentic materials related to critical thinking
  1. Deliver 1-on-1 debate using appropriate grammar (rubric provided)
  2. Summarize the content of the debate
 Kriteria:

Spoken


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif

Materi: IELTS
Pustaka: Lougheed. 2013. Barron’s IELTS Practice Exams. Columbia University: USA.		 5%

11

Minggu ke 11
  1. Being able to evaluate arguments presented by others, and to identify flaws or weaknesses in those arguments.
  2. Being able to summarize the main ideas and supporting details in authentic materials related to critical thinking
  3. Being able to summarize the main ideas and supporting details in authentic materials related to critical thinking
  1. Deliver 1-on-1 debate using appropriate grammar (rubric provided)
  2. Summarize the content of the debate
 Kriteria:

Spoken


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 One on One Debate
100 menit
Materi: IELTS
Pustaka: Lougheed. 2013. Barron’s IELTS Practice Exams. Columbia University: USA.		 5%

12

Minggu ke 12
  1. Being able to evaluate arguments presented by others, and to identify flaws or weaknesses in those arguments.
  2. Being able to summarize the main ideas and supporting details in authentic materials related to critical thinking
  3. Being able to summarize the main ideas and supporting details in authentic materials related to critical thinking
  1. Deliver 1-on-1 debate using appropriate grammar (rubric provided)
  2. Summarize the content of the debate
 Kriteria:
  1. Written
  2. Oral

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Summarize the content of debtae
100 menit
Materi: Debate
Pustaka: Freely, A.J. & Steinberg, D.L. 2009. Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 12th edition. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.		 5%

13

Minggu ke 13
  1. Being able to identify the key elements of debating, including the structure of a debate, the roles of the speakers, and the types of arguments that are commonly used.
  2. Being able to summarize the main ideas and supporting details in non-authentic materials related to critical thinking
  1. Answer comprehension questions on the different types of parliamentary system
  2. Summarize the content of an audio-visual material
 Kriteria:
  1. Written
  2. Oral

Bentuk Penilaian :
Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Summerize the content fo the debate
100 menit
Materi: Debate
Pustaka: Osborn, M., Osborn, S., and Osborn, R. (2017). Public Speaking (11th ed.). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.		 1%

14

Minggu ke 14
  1. Being able to develop arguments, using evidence and rhetorical devices to support their position
  2. Being able to evaluate arguments presented by others, and to identify flaws or weaknesses in those arguments.
  3. Being able to evaluate arguments presented by others, and to identify flaws or weaknesses in those arguments.
  4. Being able to evaluate arguments presented by others, and to identify flaws or weaknesses in those arguments.
  1. Group debate on certain SDG topics (Asian Parliamentary)
  2. Summarize the content of the debate
 Kriteria:
  1. Spoken
  2. written

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Group debate
100 menit
Materi: Argumentation
Pustaka: Freely, A.J. & Steinberg, D.L. 2009. Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 12th edition. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.		 10%

15

Minggu ke 15
  1. Being able to develop arguments, using evidence and rhetorical devices to support their position
  2. Being able to evaluate arguments presented by others, and to identify flaws or weaknesses in those arguments.
  3. Being able to evaluate arguments presented by others, and to identify flaws or weaknesses in those arguments.
  4. Being able to evaluate arguments presented by others, and to identify flaws or weaknesses in those arguments.
  1. Group debate on certain SDG topics (Asian Parliamentary)
  2. Summarize the content of the debate
 Kriteria:

Written


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Group Debate
100 mnit
Materi: Debate
Pustaka: Freely, A.J. & Steinberg, D.L. 2009. Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 12th edition. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.		 5%

16

Minggu ke 16
  1. Being able to develop arguments, using evidence and rhetorical devices to support their position
  2. Being able to evaluate arguments presented by others, and to identify flaws or weaknesses in those arguments.
  3. Being able to evaluate arguments presented by others, and to identify flaws or weaknesses in those arguments.
  4. Being able to evaluate arguments presented by others, and to identify flaws or weaknesses in those arguments.
  1. Group debate on certain SDG topics (Asian Parliamentary)
  2. Summarize the content of the debate
 Kriteria:

Spoken


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Reflective Practice
100 menit
Materi: Argumentation
Pustaka: Freely, A.J. & Steinberg, D.L. 2009. Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 12th edition. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Materi: IELTS
Pustaka: Lougheed. 2013. Barron’s IELTS Practice Exams. Columbia University: USA.		 5%



Rekap Persentase Evaluasi : Case Study

No Evaluasi Persentase
1. Aktifitas Partisipasif 67.5%
2. Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk 1%
3. Penilaian Portofolio 14%
4. Praktik / Unjuk Kerja 22.5%
100%

Catatan

  1. Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan Program Studi (PLO - Program Studi) adalah kemampuan yang dimiliki oleh setiap lulusan Program Studi yang merupakan internalisasi dari sikap, penguasaan pengetahuan dan ketrampilan sesuai dengan jenjang prodinya yang diperoleh melalui proses pembelajaran.
  2. PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah adalah beberapa capaian pembelajaran lulusan program studi (CPL-Program Studi) yang digunakan untuk pembentukan/pengembangan sebuah mata kuliah yang terdiri dari aspek sikap, ketrampulan umum, ketrampilan khusus dan pengetahuan.
  3. Program Objectives (PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap bahan kajian atau materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
  4. Sub-PO Mata kuliah (Sub-PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PO yang dapat diukur atau diamati dan merupakan kemampuan akhir yang direncanakan pada tiap tahap pembelajaran, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
  5. Indikator penilaian kemampuan dalam proses maupun hasil belajar mahasiswa adalah pernyataan spesifik dan terukur yang mengidentifikasi kemampuan atau kinerja hasil belajar mahasiswa yang disertai bukti-bukti.
  6. Kreteria Penilaian adalah patokan yang digunakan sebagai ukuran atau tolok ukur ketercapaian pembelajaran dalam penilaian berdasarkan indikator-indikator yang telah ditetapkan. Kreteria penilaian merupakan pedoman bagi penilai agar penilaian konsisten dan tidak bias. Kreteria dapat berupa kuantitatif ataupun kualitatif.
  7. Bentuk penilaian: tes dan non-tes.
  8. Bentuk pembelajaran: Kuliah, Responsi, Tutorial, Seminar atau yang setara, Praktikum, Praktik Studio, Praktik Bengkel, Praktik Lapangan, Penelitian, Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat dan/atau bentuk pembelajaran lain yang setara.
  9. Metode Pembelajaran: Small Group Discussion, Role-Play & Simulation, Discovery Learning, Self-Directed Learning, Cooperative Learning, Collaborative Learning, Contextual Learning, Project Based Learning, dan metode lainnya yg setara.
  10. Materi Pembelajaran adalah rincian atau uraian dari bahan kajian yg dapat disajikan dalam bentuk beberapa pokok dan sub-pokok bahasan.
  11. Bobot penilaian adalah prosentasi penilaian terhadap setiap pencapaian sub-PO yang besarnya proposional dengan tingkat kesulitan pencapaian sub-PO tsb., dan totalnya 100%.
  12. TM=Tatap Muka, PT=Penugasan terstruktur, BM=Belajar mandiri.