Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni
Program Studi S1 Sastra Inggris

Kode Dokumen

SEMESTER LEARNING PLAN

Course

KODE

Rumpun MataKuliah

Bobot Kredit

SEMESTER

Tanggal Penyusunan

Critical Literacy

7920204314

T=2

P=1

ECTS=4.77

2

13 Juli 2025

OTORISASI

Pengembang S.P

Koordinator Rumpun matakuliah

Koordinator Program Studi




Dwi Nur Cahyani Sri Kusumaningtyas, S.S., M.Hum.


Prof Pratiwi Retnaningdyah, Ph.D


Dr. Ali Mustofa, S.S., M.Pd.

Model Pembelajaran

Case Study

Program Learning Outcomes (PLO)

PLO program Studi yang dibebankan pada matakuliah

PLO-2

Menunjukkan karakter tangguh, kolaboratif, adaptif, inovatif, inklusif, belajar sepanjang hayat, dan berjiwa kewirausahaan

PLO-3

Mengembangkan pemikiran logis, kritis, sistematis, dan kreatif dalam melakukan pekerjaan yang spesifik di bidang keahliannya serta sesuai dengan standar kompetensi kerja bidang yang bersangkutan

PLO-10

Mampu menghasilkan karya akademik atau non-akademik dengan baik dalam bentuk lisan maupun tulisan untuk beragam audiens dan tujuan

PLO-11

Mampu mendemonstrasikan kemampuan berbahasa Inggris, yang ditunjukkan dengan pencapaian skor tes kemampuan Bahasa Inggris yang setara dengan minimal CEFR level B2

Program Objectives (PO)

PO - 1

Being able to identify and analyze how SDGs issues are represented and potentially challenged within literary and cultural texts.

PO - 2

Being able to produce written and oral responses to reading and listening materials, demonstrating an ability to synthesize information and present well-structured arguments

PO - 3

Being able to write non-academic pieces, such as reviews about SDGs issues, for different audiences and contexts, demonstrating the ability to make complex ideas easy to understand.

PO - 4

Being able to demonstrate English language proficiency by effectively analyzing and critiquing literary texts in written and oral forms.

Matrik PLO-PO
 
POPLO-2PLO-3PLO-10PLO-11
PO-1✔   
PO-2 ✔  
PO-3  ✔ 
PO-4   ✔

Matrik PO pada Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar (Sub-PO)
 
PO Minggu Ke
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
PO-1✔✔
PO-2✔✔✔✔
PO-3✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔
PO-4

Deskripsi Singkat Mata Kuliah

Critical Literacy is a course that integrates two skills: reading and writing. In the reading component, the skills developed include finding the main idea, reading graphs, predicting, skimming, and scanning. Meanwhile, in the writing component, the focus is on developing expository writing, which includes cause-effect, compare-contrast, and problem-solving, followed by argumentative writing. This course is designed to enhance students’ academic literacy by engaging them with various texts and encouraging critical thinking. Through interactive activities and structured writing tasks, students learn to analyze information and express their ideas clearly. By the end of the course, they are expected to be able to construct well-organized essays and respond critically to diverse reading materials.

Pustaka

Utama :

  1. Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 2 : The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press
  2. Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 3: The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press
  3. Kirszner, L G & Mandell, S R. 2018. Patterns for college writing (14th edition). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
  4. Newsome, Bruce. 2016. An Introduction to research analysis and writing . California:Sage publication
  5. Bailey, S. 2018. Academic writing : a handbook for international students. New York: Routledge.

Pendukung :

Dosen Pengampu

Diana Budi Darma, S.S., M.Pd.

Kenya Permata Kusumadewi, S.S., M.Pd.

Hujuala Rika Ayu, S.S., M.A.

Dr. Zulidyana Dwi Rusnalasari, M.Hum.

Dwi Nur Cahyani Sri Kusumaningtyas, S.S., M.Hum.

Uci Elly Kholidah, S.S., M.A.

Ephrilia Noor Fitriana, S.Hum., M.Hum.

Minggu Ke-

Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar
(Sub-PO)

Penilaian

Bantuk Pembelajaran,

Metode Pembelajaran,

Penugasan Mahasiswa,

 [ Estimasi Waktu]

Materi Pembelajaran

[ Pustaka ]

Bobot Penilaian (%)

Indikator

Kriteria & Bentuk

Luring (offline)

Daring (online)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

1

Minggu ke 1
  1. Being able to previewing and predicting before they read the text.
  2. Being able to know the structure of expository writing

Students are able to know what is critical literacy that include reading and writing skills

 Kriteria:

Written


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 The lecturer explains some reading skills target in this semester
4 X 50
Materi: Unit 1
Pustaka: Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 2 : The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press
Materi: UNIT 3
Pustaka: Kirszner, L G & Mandell, S R. 2018. Patterns for college writing (14th edition). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.		 2%

2

Minggu ke 2

Being able to previewing and predicting before they read the text.

Students are able to know what is Active Reading

 Kriteria:

Written


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 The lecturer explains some reading skills target in this semester
4 X 50
Materi: UNIT 3
Pustaka: Kirszner, L G & Mandell, S R. 2018. Patterns for college writing (14th edition). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Materi: UNIT 3
Pustaka: Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 2 : The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press		 3%

3

Minggu ke 3

Being able to find main idea by applying chunks reading skill

Ability to accurately identify the main idea of a chunk of text

Kriteria:

Oral and written


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Praktik / Unjuk Kerja		 Students read a short text from Inside Reading 2 unit 2, and try to find the sentence that states the main idea using the chunks technique.
4 X 50
Materi: UNIT 2 : Finding Main Idea apllying the chunks reading skill
Pustaka: Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 2 : The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press		 3%

4

Minggu ke 4

Being able to find important information from the text by scanning

To identify new words. To explain pattern of the paragraph & previewing the information. To understand longer passages.

 Kriteria:

Students can find the information they need in a relatively short time through scanning and can distinguish between important and less important information.


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Students apply scanning to find specific information from text they‘ve read.
4 X 50
Materi: UNIT 3 : Scanning
Pustaka: Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 2 : The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press
Materi: UNIT 3
Pustaka: Kirszner, L G & Mandell, S R. 2018. Patterns for college writing (14th edition). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.		 3%

5

Minggu ke 5
  1. Being able to make an outline based on the text they have read
  2. Being able to write non-academic pieces, such as reviews about SDGs issues, for different audiences and contexts, demonstrating the ability to make complex ideas easy to understand.

students are able to identify and organize main ideas and supporting details also to create an outline effectively and accurately

 Kriteria:

written and oral


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Lecturing and discussion
4 X 50
Materi: UNIT 4 : Outlining
Pustaka: Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 2 : The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press
Materi: unit 4
Pustaka: Kirszner, L G & Mandell, S R. 2018. Patterns for college writing (14th edition). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.		 3%

6

Minggu ke 6
  1. Being able to read graphs appropiately
  2. Being able to write non-academic pieces, such as reviews about SDGs issues, for different audiences and contexts, demonstrating the ability to make complex ideas easy to understand.

To explain what has been presented in the text (about some theme in the stories), the meaning of difficult words. To identify new words. To explain pattern of the paragraph & previewing the ­­information. To understand longer passages. To explain figurative language, writer’s point of view, messages, and understand its meaning contextually.

 Kriteria:

written and oral


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif
Identifying the graph‘s purpose by Determining the purpose of the graph by examining its title and any accompanying text. This will provide context for the presented data and help the student interpret the graph more accurately.
2 X 50		 Materi: UNIT 5 : Reading Graph
Pustaka: Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 2 : The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press
Materi: unit 4
Pustaka: Kirszner, L G & Mandell, S R. 2018. Patterns for college writing (14th edition). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.		 5%

7

Minggu ke 7

Being able to read graphs appropiately
  1. Being able to write non-academic pieces, such as reviews about SDGs issues, for different audiences and contexts, demonstrating the ability to make complex ideas easy to understand.
  2. Being able to identify and analyze how SDGs issues are represented and potentially challenged within literary and cultural texts.
 Kriteria:

written and oral


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Students should present their findings to the class.
2 X 50
Materi: UNIT 5 : Reading Graph
Pustaka: Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 2 : The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press
Materi: unit 5
Pustaka: Kirszner, L G & Mandell, S R. 2018. Patterns for college writing (14th edition). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.		 5%

8

Minggu ke 8
  1. being able to write about their experience with different reading strategies and techniques and how these strategies have helped them improve their reading skills
  2. Being able to demonstrate English language proficiency by effectively analyzing and critiquing literary texts in written and oral forms.
  1. Being able to demonstrate English language proficiency by effectively analyzing and critiquing literary texts in written and oral forms.
  2. being able to write about their experience with different reading strategies and techniques and how these strategies have helped them improve their reading skills
 Kriteria:
  1. Being able to write non-academic pieces, such as reviews about SDGs issues, for different audiences and contexts, demonstrating the ability to make complex ideas easy to understand.
  2. Being able to complete assigned listening totalling a specific number of hours (minimum 2 hours per fortnight) and demonstrate understanding through quizzes or reflecting journals.

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Students will keep a learning log throughout the course, in which they reflect on their progress,
challenges, and successes
4 x 50
Materi: UNIT 7
Pustaka: Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 2 : The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press		 20%

9

Minggu ke 9
  1. Being able to improve critical thinking skills and problem solving by reading advanced level text
  2. 2 Being able to increase vocabulary and language proficiency by reading advanced texts
  3. Being able to enhanched reading comprehension skills, improve their ability to understand complex sentence structures, identify key ideas, and draw inferences from the text.

written and oral

 Kriteria:

Being able to write non-academic pieces, such as reviews about SDGs issues, for different audiences and contexts, demonstrating the ability to make complex ideas easy to understand.


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Students do close reading to apply some reading skills and answer questions - mid term
4 x 50
Materi: exercises
Pustaka: Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 2 : The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press
Materi: unit 1
Pustaka: Bailey, S. 2018. Academic writing : a handbook for international students. New York: Routledge.		 5%

10

Minggu ke 10
  1. being able to write about their experience with different reading strategies and techniques and how these strategies have helped them improve their reading skills
  2. Being able to demonstrate English language proficiency by effectively analyzing and critiquing literary texts in written and oral forms.

written and oral

 Kriteria:
  1. Students can develop a focused and arguable thesis that guides the entire essay.
  2. being able to write about their experience with different reading strategies and techniques and how these strategies have helped them improve their reading skills
  3. Being able to produce written and oral responses to reading and listening materials, demonstrating an ability to synthesize information and present well-structured arguments.

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Students can provide a lot
of information in a small
space and preview a table or
chart.
4 x 50
Materi: UNIT 6
Pustaka: Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 2 : The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press
Materi: unit 3
Pustaka: Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 3: The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press
Materi: unit 1
Pustaka: Bailey, S. 2018. Academic writing : a handbook for international students. New York: Routledge.		 3%

11

Minggu ke 11
  1. Being able to create summary accurately based on key information
  2. Being able to produce both written and oral responses to reading and listening materials by effectively synthesizing information and presenting logical, coherent, and persuasive arguments.

written and oral

 Kriteria:
  1. Students can organize and write an opinion essay
  2. Being able to write non-academic pieces, such as reviews about SDGs issues, for different audiences and contexts, demonstrating the ability to make complex ideas easy to understand.

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Students will read books of their choice and write reviews that summarizes the main points
2 x 50
Materi: unit 5
Pustaka: Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 3: The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press
Materi: unit 6
Pustaka: Bailey, S. 2018. Academic writing : a handbook for international students. New York: Routledge.		 3%

12

Minggu ke 12
  1. Finishing argumentative essay based on the feedback
  2. Students can draw logical conclusions based on implicit information within the text.

Can read and interpret statistical tables

 Kriteria:
  1. Students can draw logical conclusions based on implicit information within the text.
  2. Students can organize their essay effectively with a clear introduction, logically ordered body paragraphs, counterarguments, and a strong conclusion.

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif
The students discussed with
their group and interpreted
numerical information in
tables.
4 x 50		 Materi: UNIT 7 : Making Inference
Pustaka:
Materi: UNIT 7 Making inference
Pustaka: Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 3: The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press
Materi: Argumentative writing
Pustaka: Bailey, S. 2018. Academic writing : a handbook for international students. New York: Routledge.		 5%

13

Minggu ke 13
  1. Being able to apply differenet annotation and notetaking techniques based on the tupe of the text
  2. Being able to produce written and oral responses to reading and listening materials, demonstrating an ability to synthesize information and present well-structured arguments.

written and oral

 Kriteria:
  1. Students can make annotation and notetaking a text within its social, political, cultural, or historical context, and relate it to other texts or global issues.
  2. Students can construct arguments that are logical, evidence-based, and supported by credible sources.

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif, Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk		 Applying annotation and highlighting techinuques
2 x 50
Materi: unit 8
Pustaka: Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 3: The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press
Materi: argumentative essay
Pustaka: Bailey, S. 2018. Academic writing : a handbook for international students. New York: Routledge.		 5%

14

Minggu ke 14
  1. Being able to use time sequences accurately and effectively
  2. Being able to produce written and oral responses to reading and listening materials, demonstrating an ability to synthesize information and present well-structured arguments.

written and oral

 Kriteria:

Being able to produce written and oral responses to reading and listening materials, demonstrating an ability to synthesize information and present well-structured arguments.


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Reading some short stories and break the story into the sequences
2 x 50
Materi: Inferences
Pustaka: Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 2 : The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press
Materi: evidence-based
Pustaka: Bailey, S. 2018. Academic writing : a handbook for international students. New York: Routledge.		 2%

15

Minggu ke 15
  1. Being able to respond critically to a text in both oral and written form, presenting well-reasoned arguments.
  2. Students can acknowledge opposing views and respond with thoughtful rebuttals.

written and oral

 Kriteria:

written and oral


Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 At the end of the course, students will write a final reflection on what they have learned, how they have improved, and what strategies they will continue to use in the future
Materi: reflective note
Pustaka: Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 2 : The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press
Materi: Evidence-based
Pustaka: Bailey, S. 2018. Academic writing : a handbook for international students. New York: Routledge.		 3%

16

Minggu ke 16
  1. Being able to improve critical thinking skills and problem solving by reading advanced level texts
  2. Being able to increase vocabulary and language proficiency by reading advanced text
  3. Being able to enhanched reading comprehension skills, improve their ability to understand complex sentence structures, identify key ideas, and draw inferences from the text.

written and oral

 Kriteria:
  1. Being able to improve critical thinking skills and problem solving by reading advanced level texts
  2. Being able to increase vocabulary and language proficiency by reading advanced text

Bentuk Penilaian :
Aktifitas Partisipasif		 Submit the creative writing project - Final term
Materi: submited
Pustaka: Burgmeier, Arline (2013). Inside Reading 2 : The Academic Word List in Context. 2nd Edition. Oxford : University Press
Materi: argumentative
Pustaka: Bailey, S. 2018. Academic writing : a handbook for international students. New York: Routledge.		 30%



Rekap Persentase Evaluasi : Case Study

No Evaluasi Persentase
1. Aktifitas Partisipasif 96%
2. Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk 2.5%
3. Praktik / Unjuk Kerja 1.5%
100%

Catatan

  1. Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan Program Studi (PLO - Program Studi) adalah kemampuan yang dimiliki oleh setiap lulusan Program Studi yang merupakan internalisasi dari sikap, penguasaan pengetahuan dan ketrampilan sesuai dengan jenjang prodinya yang diperoleh melalui proses pembelajaran.
  2. PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah adalah beberapa capaian pembelajaran lulusan program studi (CPL-Program Studi) yang digunakan untuk pembentukan/pengembangan sebuah mata kuliah yang terdiri dari aspek sikap, ketrampulan umum, ketrampilan khusus dan pengetahuan.
  3. Program Objectives (PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PLO yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap bahan kajian atau materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
  4. Sub-PO Mata kuliah (Sub-PO) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari PO yang dapat diukur atau diamati dan merupakan kemampuan akhir yang direncanakan pada tiap tahap pembelajaran, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
  5. Indikator penilaian kemampuan dalam proses maupun hasil belajar mahasiswa adalah pernyataan spesifik dan terukur yang mengidentifikasi kemampuan atau kinerja hasil belajar mahasiswa yang disertai bukti-bukti.
  6. Kreteria Penilaian adalah patokan yang digunakan sebagai ukuran atau tolok ukur ketercapaian pembelajaran dalam penilaian berdasarkan indikator-indikator yang telah ditetapkan. Kreteria penilaian merupakan pedoman bagi penilai agar penilaian konsisten dan tidak bias. Kreteria dapat berupa kuantitatif ataupun kualitatif.
  7. Bentuk penilaian: tes dan non-tes.
  8. Bentuk pembelajaran: Kuliah, Responsi, Tutorial, Seminar atau yang setara, Praktikum, Praktik Studio, Praktik Bengkel, Praktik Lapangan, Penelitian, Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat dan/atau bentuk pembelajaran lain yang setara.
  9. Metode Pembelajaran: Small Group Discussion, Role-Play & Simulation, Discovery Learning, Self-Directed Learning, Cooperative Learning, Collaborative Learning, Contextual Learning, Project Based Learning, dan metode lainnya yg setara.
  10. Materi Pembelajaran adalah rincian atau uraian dari bahan kajian yg dapat disajikan dalam bentuk beberapa pokok dan sub-pokok bahasan.
  11. Bobot penilaian adalah prosentasi penilaian terhadap setiap pencapaian sub-PO yang besarnya proposional dengan tingkat kesulitan pencapaian sub-PO tsb., dan totalnya 100%.
  12. TM=Tatap Muka, PT=Penugasan terstruktur, BM=Belajar mandiri.